A Wilderness of Spite
Once
every four years, the modern world focuses its attention upon the Olympic
Games. This festival of physical ability, symbolizing the manifestation of what
is believed to be a universal value system embodied in the concept of Olympism, reminds people' of all nations,
paradoxically, of the equality of man. Realistically, the Olympic arena proves
to be as much a testing ground for the stated ideals of man as for his athletic
prowess. Thus, when the freedom of the spirit of participation is stifled by
political maneuverings, any truly universal identification with the dignity of
man must suffer. A Wilderness of Spite concerns human dignity,
particularly as it is mirrored in the context of the quadrennial Olympiads.
In
1968,
Athletes,
in general, can be said to be indifferent to politics. This was especially true
of the Rhodesian athletes, some of whom could neither read nor write; yet their
lack of interest in politics might be seen as the antithesis of the fervor they
felt for their homelands to which they could bring national honors. Indeed,
national pride may run deeper in athletes from smaller nations. Certainly, the
Olympic Games provide a unique opportunity for an "unknown" country
to be given international recognition by the outstanding efforts of one of its
sons.
Like
At
the current point in time, there are very few texts which provide the
sociologist of sport with compacted material in one volume. In this respect, A Wilderness of Spite makes
a fine addition to the literature of sport sociology. The usefulness of this
book will be recognized by those concerned with problems of racism in sport, of
politics in sport, of the sociology of coaching, and of sport in international
perspective, among others. Not least of all, A Wilderness of Spite introduces sociology of the
Olympics.
BENJAMIN LOWE, Ph.D.